From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 14 18:50:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36D1F45; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cochard@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x231.google.com (mail-ve0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08292476; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id db12so1900995veb.22 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:50:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/cuWua3KDkh6N+MoMwXcUoLKAbOeUwYx5AACQMHPtbc=; b=O1UlmyHnbTj+sgU6LCj9npvH4o6X88SBN3g84lWL/bVNWoLgp0H9Fv/TNJC0W+7M+R nEWGG/cFPTqz/WmR6+4t4pPZiEieyii4a8v3QixD/nIi42yANuRCy+jJjOQtJo77MBk3 tEfzncV5pH6zoBQmWpYQ+/UxZhJC4rcvku6++QPybEZZLnQAuddvfOoo3qFrEy4Bm+vo vLYCyTwqwd3SgENVZFUjENeCEk+AkPjypH4FmcXs6lKeVQTP8vaCE5FXbhI5Ifb1Pwc2 YzCv1t1m+KVkgRWn3MBK0Xcco/y2Evhg0/Fv5StOGd5NkzCH/j0GA858i7AQ9R7DywfI Dn/A== X-Received: by 10.220.13.20 with SMTP id z20mr18354266vcz.0.1379184607005; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:50:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cochard@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.221.9 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:49:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130914142802.GC71010@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <521E41CB.30700@yandex-team.ru> <6BDA4619-783C-433E-9819-A7EAA0BD3299@neville-neil.com> <20130914142802.GC71010@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 20:49:46 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jGoYAycMs8RBkfo6ZVCAv397HvM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Network stack changes To: Luigi Rizzo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 20:00:24 +0000 Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , Adrian Chadd , Andre Oppermann , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , Luigi Rizzo , "Andrey V. Elsukov" , FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:50:08 -0000 On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > IXIA ? For the timescales we need to address we don't need an IXIA, > a netmap sender is more than enough > The great netmap generates only one IP flow (same src/dst IP and same src/dst port). This don't permit to test multi-queue NIC (or SMP packet-filter) on a simple lab like this: netmap sender => freebsd router => netmap receiver Regards, Olivier