Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:38:02 +1000 (Australia/NSW) From: Darren Reed <avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au> To: anderson@centtech.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Racoon IPSEC issues Message-ID: <200109061438.f86Ec2Mq020422@cairo.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <3B978211.EB11940E@centtech.com> from "Eric Anderson" at Sep 06, 2001 09:02:57 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Eric Anderson, sie said: [...] > 2001-09-06 08:51:55: INFO: isakmp.c:965:isakmp_ph2begin_r(): responde > new phase 2 negotiation: xx.yy.zz.60[0]<=>xx.yy.zz.128[0] > 2001-09-06 08:51:55: ERROR: proposal.c:951:set_proposal_from_policy(): > not supported nested SA. Ignore. > 2001-09-06 08:51:55: ERROR: proposal.c:999:set_proposal_from_policy(): > There is a difference between the in/out bound policies. Those last messages might give you a hint. What does your racoon.conf & setkey's look like for the tunnels which do work and those that don't ? Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109061438.f86Ec2Mq020422>