From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 6 23:32:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB3237B401 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6228343E42 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:32:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 2CCDE812E1; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:51 +0930 (CST) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:51 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: FreeBSD current users Subject: Do we still need portmap(8)? Message-ID: <20021007063250.GF14070@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: AUUG: Australian UNIX and Open Systems User Group Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.auug.org.au/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very least, the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message