Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Feb 2006 01:23:55 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: SOLVED - Re: Ethereal port doesn't install GUI
Message-ID:  <1139034235.1368.42.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <43E4452C.2040505@meijome.net>
References:  <43E3F344.1030200@meijome.net>  <43E4452C.2040505@meijome.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-Q2Fhcz7WUcrUyia0ug4G
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 17:09 +1100, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is there other port that installs the GTK Ethereal interface ? net/port=
s=20
> > is installing tethereal and lots of other files, but NOT=20
> > /usr/X11R6/bin/ethereal.
> >=20
> [....]
> >=20
>=20
> > $ sudo nice make WITH_X11=3Dtrue install
>=20
> Ok, figured it out, the following works as a simple make install (IMHO),=20
> should:
>=20
> make WITH_X11=3Dyes WITH_GTK2=3Dyes WITH_GNOME2=3Dyes install
>=20
> Given that there also exist the tethereal and -lite ports, shouldn't the=20
> "ethereal" port build with those options by default?

It is.  You must have conflicting options in /etc/make.conf.

Joe

--=20
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team      ::      gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome

--=-Q2Fhcz7WUcrUyia0ug4G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBD5Eh7b2iPiv4Uz4cRArM4AJ9Rvqre1GhNVLD2XMku0jQRt9W4QwCfZafa
01IFvnTo82D4nlqLNEpwHIQ=
=OOR+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Q2Fhcz7WUcrUyia0ug4G--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1139034235.1368.42.camel>