From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jun 3 19:23:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA11525 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (root@agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA11517 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [204.178.32.161]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA29344 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA06706; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 22:39:12 GMT Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 22:39:12 +0000 (GMT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: jwb@fore.com, bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp and static IP (fwd) In-Reply-To: <2910.865365591@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I do happen to have some extra eval Bays here, and I think I may be able to set up an interface as RS232 and throw a modem w/PPP on it... These are running SW rel. 11.01. It'd be a long-distance call to NYC, but if anyone wants to play, they are welcome. Charles On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > This is a compatibility issue between a Bay release and seems to be unique > > to freebsd pppd. Bay claims the freebsd crew screwed up. I thought you might > > like to know. If I am wrong on either assumption please accept my sincere > > apologies. I'm a user, not a developer (or even programmer for that matter). > > We do like to know about such things, but I don't see how we have any > hope of actually doing anything about this without a lot more debugging > information. > > It's sort of like calling up tech support and saying "my computer > doesn't work." They ask "what do you mean? how?" and you answer "I > don't know, it just doesn't work. Thought you guys would want to > know, that's all." Things can only go rapidly downhill from there, > you dig? > > That's why I asked you to try out userland ppp first so that we could > at least narrow down the behavior to pppd or not. That's the first > level of coarse adjustment, lacking much detail about the actual failure > with pppd. We certainly can't afford to go out and buy a Bay Networks > device, so I'm genuinely puzzled as to what you expected us to accomplish > with so little information. :-( > > Jordan >