From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jun 12 12:52:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA28016 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:52:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rheingold.reed.edu (wcooley@c029h021.ipdorm.reed.edu [134.10.29.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA27971 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:52:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wcooley@nakedape.ml.org) Received: from localhost (wcooley@localhost) by rheingold.reed.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA19784 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:49:45 -0700 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:49:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "W. Reilly Cooley, Esq." X-Sender: wcooley@rheingold.reed.edu To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius login via getty In-Reply-To: <199806120538.WAA00405@antipodes.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > This is the "20 million flies" argument. PAM is broken as designed; > implementing it might be expedient, but will never be "right". How is PAM broken? How is the other better? Dein Wil -- ------------------------------------------------------------- W. Reilly Cooley, Esq. Naked Ape Consulting wcooley@nakedape.ml.org http://www.nakedape.ml.org Links page ----> http://www.nakedape.ml.org/links To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message