From owner-cvs-lib  Wed Dec 18 06:13:10 1996
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-lib>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id GAA08231
          for cvs-lib-outgoing; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 06:13:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id GAA08210;
          Wed, 18 Dec 1996 06:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id GAA01781; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 06:12:38 -0800 (PST)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: ache@nagual.ru, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org,
        jkh@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys semctl.2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Dec 1996 01:01:10 +1100."
             <199612181401.BAA03686@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 06:12:38 -0800
Message-ID: <1778.850918358@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> semctl(3)).  There's an apperently-undocemented __semctl() system
> call, but this isn't used by either semctl(2) or ibcs2.  They use the
> apparently-undocumented semsys() system call.

That would explain my confusion, anyway - I did indeed look at
__semctl() and leapt to the wrong conclusion.  Sorry again, Andrey!

					Jordan