From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 22 05:07:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D3616A4B3 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 05:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653B343FE5 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 05:07:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27F3420A5E; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 05:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 05:07:27 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030922120726.GW47671@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org References: <200309220850.13662.andy@athame.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Why is KDE installing in LOCALBASE; not X11BASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:07:28 -0000 On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:00:11AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Awful a lot of WM are in /usr/X11R6, so I think we see the winner easily. It's just a convention, and there's no reason to change it, other than, maybe, POLA (from whose perspective, becomes the question). hier(7) needs a lot of clarification if you ask me. IMHO the LSB is much better specified, but it's also much longer. KDE will stay where it is until there is a good reason to put it somewhere else. Regards, -- wca