Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:38:10 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Lars Stokholm <lars.stokholm@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Behavior of portmaster -e
Message-ID:  <47E97ED2.60206@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <47E9487D.6000909@gmail.com>
References:  <47E9487D.6000909@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lars Stokholm wrote:
> First of all, I love portmaster. :)

Thanks. :)

> Second, I did a "portmaster -e docbook-*" and since it finished 
> successfully, I expected it had deleted all of my docbook ports, but it 
> hadn't. From what I could see it had just deleted the first match.
> 
> Shouldn't it delete all docbook-* ports? If not, shouldn't it fail, 
> instead of just deleting the first match?

A long time ago a user proposed that portmaster support globbing for 
names in /var/db/pkg, and the user that suggested it thought that the 
way it should work is one port at a time. Since I didn't have any strong 
feelings about that, I went with their suggestion.

However, as time goes on it has become increasingly obvious that most 
users expect anything with a * at the end to match _all_ ports that 
match the pattern, not just one. In order to support that I will have to 
rework the parser a bit, which I don't have time for right at the 
moment, but should be able to get to soon.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47E97ED2.60206>