Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:38:49 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists@toco-domains.de> To: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>, FreeBSD ports list !!!! <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [moved from toolchain] GCC5: pkg vs. ports Message-ID: <56B21F09.5080409@toco-domains.de> In-Reply-To: <56B21641.5000308@hiwaay.net> References: <56B20CA6.2080208@hiwaay.net> <56B211EE.70404@toco-domains.de> <56B21641.5000308@hiwaay.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03.02.2016 15:59, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >> >> On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled. >> >> make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It >> does not affect or display the settings of pkg. >> >> To check the configuration of "pkg-ports" perform a: >> $ pkg info gcc5 > > > Thanks. Where is the local portstree info stored ? My local (newly > updated) ports gcc5-devel shows graphite enabled (see previous > response), I thought a 'portsnap fetch update' would overwrite that, no > ? Thanks (again) & TIA & have a good one .... It is in: /var/db/ports This isn't affected by portsnap. Greetings, Torsten
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56B21F09.5080409>