From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 2 14: 3:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A221B14F60 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA91040; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 23:03:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 23:03:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland To: Joe Abley Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: SMTP to dynamic ip's In-Reply-To: <19990602191911.A15558@clear.co.nz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > When it comes down to it, there is very little justification for a static > address. The one I most commonly hear is "so we can do SMTP mail delivery > to the customer", but even that doesn't mandate use of static addressing -- > we support SMTP mail delivery (we call it "mailbagging" for some reason) > to dynamically-addressed dial-up clients, and it works just fine. > Would you care to explain how? Very interested. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message