From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:08:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070191065672 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1CD8FC22 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-26-82.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.26.82]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB8B3C9F9; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:08:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q09I8ecT002134; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:08:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:08:40 +0100 From: Polytropon To: alexus Message-Id: <20120109190840.9f4db334.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:08:43 -0000 On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:17:37 -0500, alexus wrote: > Ports vs Packages? > > /usr/ports vs pkg_* > > pros/cons In short: ports: pro: most current, if properly updated build from source (security!) apply optimization (speed!) apply compile-time options (functionality!) highly configurable easy updating of installed stuff cons: requires time requires disk space requires CPU packages: pro: fast installation less typing works good on low resource systems cons: not "bleeding edge" not all ports available as packages primarily means of "first time installation" The list could go on for hours. Consensus: Use a port management tool (such as portmaster or even portupgrade) if you don't want to deal with "bare ports". Furthermore, consult the mailing list archives for more elaborate answers and discussions. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...