Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:04:48 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>
To:        security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: Truth about ssh 1.2.27 vulnerabiltiy] (fwd)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9909301303570.56219-200000@freja.webgiro.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
  Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.

-------_NextPart_10190
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9909301303572.56219@freja.webgiro.com>

Hi,

Seen on Bugtraq... The other postings mention FreeBSD 3.3 as vulnerable.


Andrzej Bialecki

//  <abial@webgiro.com> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com)
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
// ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org --------
// --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ----

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:35:44 -0400
From: Dan Astoorian <djast@CS.TORONTO.EDU>
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Truth about ssh 1.2.27 vulnerabiltiy]

I'm surprised that nothing further has been reported to Bugtraq about
this, but the problem appears to be that under Linux, a bind() to a
Unix-domain socket will follow a dangling symlink, whereas most other
Unixes appear to return an EADDRINUSE error.

I leave it to the standards lawyers to determine whether the failing is
in the operating system for allowing the bind() to succeed, or in SSH
for not testing whether the link exists.  My vote goes to the OS being
at fault, since it's easy enough for it to avoid following the link (and
no real practical reason why it *should* follow the link).

A trivial demo program that demonstrates the problem is attached.  (It
needs no special privileges; run it as an unprivileged user in any
writable directory.)  The program reports "okay" under Solaris 2.5.1 and
IRIX 6.5.2, "vulnerable" under RedHat 6.

--                          People shouldn't think that it's better to have
Dan Astoorian               loved and lost than never loved at all.  It's
Sysadmin, CS Lab            not, it's better to have loved and won.  All
djast@cs.toronto.edu        the other options really suck.    --Dan Redican

-------_NextPart_10190
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9909301303573.56219@freja.webgiro.com>
Content-Description: 

#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/un.h>

#define FPATH "./bindlinktest"
#define LPATH "./bindlinktest0"

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
    int fd;
    struct sockaddr_un sunaddr;

    fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
    if (fd < 0) { perror("socket");exit(1); };

    unlink(FPATH);
    if (symlink(FPATH, LPATH) < 0) {
	perror("symlink");exit(1);
    }

    memset(&sunaddr, 0, sizeof(sunaddr));
    sunaddr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
    strncpy(sunaddr.sun_path, LPATH, sizeof(sunaddr.sun_path));
    if (bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&sunaddr, sizeof(sunaddr)) < 0) {
	if (errno == EADDRINUSE) {
	    printf("bind() returned EADDRINUSE; this system appears to be okay.\n");
	} else {
	    perror("bind");
	}
    } else {
	printf("bind() succeeded; this system appears to be vulnerable.\n");
    }

    close(fd)
    unlink(FPATH);
    unlink(LPATH);
    exit(0);
}

-------_NextPart_10190--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9909301303570.56219-200000>