From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 05:22:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EC737B401 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 05:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E3E43F93 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 05:22:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19TKuf-000BTU-86 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:22:41 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h5KCMeCl077897 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:22:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h5KCMehK077896 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:22:40 +0100 (BST) Resent-Message-Id: <200306201222.h5KCMehK077896@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:21:21 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-chat@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org, grog@lemis.com Message-ID: <20030620122121.GC77621@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Resent-From: jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:22:40 +0100 Resent-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19TKuf-000BTU-86*wRyWYkMClwQ* Subject: SCO lawsuit update X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:22:43 -0000 http://www.lemis.com/grog/sco-sontag-16jun2003.html I just read groggy's update to the SCO suit, especially after the Sontag remarks. Well done, grog. I really wonder how such a high profile case as this is being blundered and mismanaged into miserable failure. Reminds me of the OJ Simpson case. One can only hope the courts will see it the same way. NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. jm -- My other computer is your windows box.