From owner-cvs-all Sat Apr 20 20:44: 1 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC8C37B41A; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020421034354.LQJL1102.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:43:54 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3L3hsbZ009664; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:43:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g3L3hrDp009659; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200204210343.g3L3hrDp009659@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020416 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Doug Barton Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING In-reply-to: <200204210328.g3L3Sg534129@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200204210328.g3L3Sg534129@freefall.freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to Doug Barton message dated "Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:28:42 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:43:53 -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, Doug Barton wrote: > dougb 2002/04/20 20:28:42 PDT > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > . UPDATING > Log: > Add a note about the /etc MFC (I'm still opposed to the inetd change, but if it's going to stay in, I want to make sure we do it right...) I know you're trying to get people to deal with /etc/defaults/rc.conf changes in general, and not just this specific instance. However, I think we also need to mention inetd(8) specifically in the UPDATING and HEADSUP, since that seems to be the thing that people are tripping over the most. What say you? I'm going to MFC an entry for the release notes...also need to catch up with recent changes to mergemaster. Hopefully won't break the release notes build again. :-) Bruce. PS. BTW, even though I didn't agree with every part of your MFC, thank you for putting in the time and effort to do the catch-up and diff reduction. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message