From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 31 15:44:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 30D4F16A4CE; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:44:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from telecom.net.et (sparrow.telecom.net.et [213.55.64.38])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0740D43D5D; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:44:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mtm@identd.net)
Received: from [213.55.66.168] (HELO pool-151-200-10-97.res.east.verizon.net)
  by telecom.net.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 53149894; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:37:06 +0300
Received: from rogue.acs-et.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	ESMTP id i6VFiDK3035724;	Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:44:27 +0300 (EAT)
	(envelope-from mtm@rogue.acs-et.com)
Received: (from mtm@localhost)
	by rogue.acs-et.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6VFi1WX035710;
	Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:44:01 +0300 (EAT)
	(envelope-from mtm)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:43:57 +0300
From: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
	Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Message-ID: <20040731154357.GA35674@rogue.acs-et.com>
References: <20040731104933.GA1312@rogue.acs-et.com>
	<03C7D82F-E2F5-11D8-9C56-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
	<20040731145616.GA14576@rogue.acs-et.com> <20040731150542.GA5612@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20040731151944.GA23710@rogue.acs-et.com> <20040731153303.GA6471@nagual.pp.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040731153303.GA6471@nagual.pp.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/5.2-CURRENT (i386)
cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: RFC: Alternate patch to have true new-style rc.d scripts in
	ports (without touching localpkg)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:44:07 -0000

On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 07:33:03PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:19:44PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> > scripts that have a .sh, and those that don't. If you really want
> > your script to be sourced in the same shell, then you give it a
> > .sh extension. Otherwise, it will be sourced in a subshell. So, when
> 
> It can make things even worse, what if someone rename his rc.subr-ed 
> script.sh to script.sh.old ? It was common practice in the past to not 
> execute anything without .sh at all.

I think I already answered this in a previous thread, but here goes again.
If it is an old style script (not rc.d) then it gets executed only if it
has a .sh extension and it is executable. That has NOT changed.
If it is an rc.d script then it gets executed only if the appropriate
foo_enable knob is turned on.

Cheers.
-- 
Mike Makonnen  | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc
mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: AC7B 5672 2D11 F4D0 EBF8  5279 5359 2B82 7CD4 1F55
mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon !