From owner-cvs-all Sun Feb 2 14:33:25 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BF337B401; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 14:33:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE20D43F93; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 14:33:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from opus.celabo.org (opus.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523CF95; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:33:23 -0600 (CST) Received: by opus.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5CCE458B6; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:30:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:30:41 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Tony Finch Cc: Mark Murray , Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile Message-ID: <20030202223041.GB66337@opus.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Tony Finch , Mark Murray , Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <20030202144859.GA38304@sunbay.com> <200302021719.h12HJMaX048710@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20030202172515.GB35774@opus.celabo.org> <20030202201011.A28376@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030202201011.A28376@chiark.greenend.org.uk> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:10:11PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 11:25:15AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > > > Personally I'd rather not create new man sections just for OpenSSL. I'd > > rather have them in a separate directory ---- even if the OpenSSL > > project does decide to use separate man sections. > > How does that allow users to view the clashing manual pages conveniently? Same way that it is done now for X apps or ports ... man -M ${mandir}. > There's a similar problem with some X manual pages (mouse etc.). Right. Thus the invention eons ago of support for multiple `sets' of man pages via MANPATH and -M and the like. > I > think special sections are an appropriate solution, as for Tcl. *shrug* I suppose it's a personal preference. I never really cared for sections like `n', either. I think there's more precedence for ${PREFIX}/man than for /usr/share/man/man${NEWSECTION}, but I don't feel strongly enough to argue about it. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message