From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 14:07:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA8916A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:07:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248AF43D2D for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2HEBogp070196 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:11:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j2HEBoqH070195 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:11:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:11:50 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050317141150.GA69967@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1783108411.20050313132006@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1783108411.20050313132006@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=failed version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on ei.bzerk.org Subject: Re: Who is using ACLs in production? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:07:00 -0000 On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:20:06PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski typed: > Anyone using ACLs in production on FreeBSD 5.x? If so, how do you use > them, and what are your impressions? How do they affect performance, > how reliable is the code, does it really help security, etc.? I installed many samba servers in small-to-medium sized offices. All have ACL's enabled and there have been no complaints about performance or stability. Which is understandable, regarding the fact these samba servers where mostly replacing NT or w2k fileservers on the same or equivalant hardware. Improved security I don't know. It does emulate windows' file permission quite nicely though. Ruben