Date: Wed, 01 Nov 1995 12:44:55 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> Cc: vince@apollo.COSC.GOV, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update Message-ID: <1272.815258695@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Nov 1995 11:45:05 PST." <199511011945.LAA23144@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > > So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current > > > at some point? and -stable is just really -current before a -release? > > > > NO. > NO? > I think he has it right eventhough he says it a bit oddly.. Well, odd or not, -stable is not -current at any sense. -current is an entirely separate branch, and "-release" doesn't even exist. I don't see how any answer other than "no" would have been correct! :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1272.815258695>