Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 01 Nov 1995 12:44:55 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Cc:        vince@apollo.COSC.GOV, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update 
Message-ID:  <1272.815258695@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Nov 1995 11:45:05 PST." <199511011945.LAA23144@ref.tfs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > 
> > > 	So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current 
> > > at some point?  and -stable is just really -current before a -release?
> > 
> > NO.
> NO?
> I think he has it right eventhough he says it a bit oddly..

Well, odd or not, -stable is not -current at any sense.  -current is
an entirely separate branch, and "-release" doesn't even exist.
I don't see how any answer other than "no" would have been
correct! :-)

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1272.815258695>