From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Nov  1 12:46:43 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA27294
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:46:43 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA27289
          ; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:46:40 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA01274; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:44:55 -0800
To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
cc: vince@apollo.COSC.GOV, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, jc@irbs.com,
        current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Nov 1995 11:45:05 PST."
             <199511011945.LAA23144@ref.tfs.com> 
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 1995 12:44:55 -0800
Message-ID: <1272.815258695@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > 
> > > 	So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current 
> > > at some point?  and -stable is just really -current before a -release?
> > 
> > NO.
> NO?
> I think he has it right eventhough he says it a bit oddly..

Well, odd or not, -stable is not -current at any sense.  -current is
an entirely separate branch, and "-release" doesn't even exist.
I don't see how any answer other than "no" would have been
correct! :-)

					Jordan