Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:18:27 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <20060304211826.GC46967@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060304174506.GC912@tara.freenix.org> References: <20060304141957.14716.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060304152433.W61086@fledge.watson.org> <BA422F74-E7F9-4F53-9A88-B89E2255FF00@behanna.org> <20060304173804.GA11891@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060304174506.GC912@tara.freenix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 06:45:06PM +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Steve Kargl: > > svn on a specific day. A handy little wiki to get familiar with > > svn is http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnHelp. >=20 > It was also said that they switched to a centralised vcs was to make > forking the project more difficult. What a load of FUD. Check out svk (http://svk.elixus.org/) to see why. (Hint: svk repo's are just subversion repo's with some properties). --Stijn --=20 "Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw." -- Lilo, "Disney's Lilo & Stitch" --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFECgQiY3r/tLQmfWcRAn9tAKCmrjxxqY32x6LUNcUoraNYWeQJbgCgqUCV LWugvVbRcqOh1kB4L0E7jHA= =0knU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060304211826.GC46967>