From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 17:18:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CEF16A41C for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Received: from lisa.pathlink.com (lisa.pathlink.com [129.250.169.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D395743D1F for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Received: from kachun.pathlink.com (dvl-1.pathlink.com [129.250.170.211]) by lisa.pathlink.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4NHIIBB009420; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:18:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20050523095942.00b9bd00@dvl.pathlink.com> X-Sender: kachun@dvl.pathlink.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:18:16 -0700 To: kris@obsecurity.org From: Kachun Lee Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 panic at lockmgr X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:18:20 -0000 "Kris Kennaway" wrote in message news:<20050521063233.GA51618@xor.obsecurity.org>... >On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:39:19PM -0700, Kachun Lee wrote: >> I upgraded a server from 4.10 to 5.4-rel and it paniced at soon as I put >> some load on it... >> panic: lockmgr: thread 0xfffffffe, not exclusive lock holder 0x76fe0300 >> unlocking >> The hardware is a Intel 7501 with a single 3G Xeon 6G mem. I tried >> disable option MP and made no difference. Any help or suggestion!? > Run 'show lockedvnods' and then 'trace ' for each pid listed. > Also, if you can explain how to reproduce this it would be greatly > helpful. > > Kris Thanks for the info. I will try 5.4 on that server again on this Thur/Fri (I am not in the office for these few days). It was hard to tell what really triggered that. The server is one of our NFS servers. With that first panic, I did not notice it right away. The 2nd panic, I had a top running and was staring at it since reboot. When it panic'ed (at ~6 minute uptime), the load climbed to only around 2-3. There is nothing weird showing on top. Since this is one of our production servers, I could not do too much experiment with it. I had set up a similar system with the same MB/CPU on the bench. And it ran the same 5.4-rel kernel, with some benchmark programs, over the weekend without problem. However, I do not have a way to simulate all the network traffic to that box. If you have any idea what I can try to isolate the problem a little more, let me know. Regards Kachun