From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 15:55:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1BE16A4CE for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:55:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tensor.xs4all.nl (tensor.xs4all.nl [194.109.160.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C2E43D31 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:55:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from kilgore.dim (kilgore.dim [192.168.0.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6681922852; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 16:55:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 16:55:10 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.4 Rush) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <47528984.20041106165510@andric.com> To: Divacky Roman In-Reply-To: <20041106150625.GA84763@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <418C0EED.1060301@freebsd.org> <87oeibnp4r.fsf@beeblebrox.rfc1149.net> <20041106150625.GA84763@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------E8B4167154D2406" cc: Samuel Tardieu cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and onwards X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 15:55:54 -0000 ------------E8B4167154D2406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2004-11-06 at 16:06:25 Divacky Roman wrote: >> I don't intend to open a can of worms, but I think now would be a good >> time to start small experiments wrt new RCS software. > some time ago there was a report on "using svn in fbsd developement" on > hackers@ iirc, any news in opinions on using RCS in fbsd? I'll guess that they are quite satisfied using Perforce. This is a very good and supported version control system, and IMO Subversion is not yet up to par with it. Arch is quite nice, but a completely different approach, seemingly better suited to de-central development such as with Linux. ------------E8B4167154D2406 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBjPPesF6jCi4glqMRArMXAJ0WuoaGwLilce+zux5SIceaK/iy9gCg++Y7 NUArDrX3s79gjkMJYR9W1TA= =zI2I -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------E8B4167154D2406--