From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 17 13:27:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DEE16A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:27:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F01443D54 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:27:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1BlpEJ-0004eO-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:27:55 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16633.10572.42186.100897@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:27:40 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1048.216.195.139.40.1090068712.squirrel@new.host.name> References: <1048.216.195.139.40.1090068712.squirrel@new.host.name> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: upgrading form 4.2 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:27:56 -0000 Brent Bailey writes: > The customer is running a file server samba also running apache > running FBSD 4.2, he wants to upgrade using cvsup & the make > buildworld procedure to upgrade to 5.x. Your familiarity not withstanding, I would recommend against this. About the only reason to do this upgrade in-place is the utter lack of machines on which to put a fresh installation. The reasons _not_ to do this are legion, starting with disruption of a production enviroment and the (non-trivial) possibility it won't work and won't be restorable, all the way to reclaiming disk space used by abandoned executables/libraries/data. If desirable, it will also provide the opportunity to increase disk size and re-partition to meet actual use rather than following generic guidelines. Robert Huff