From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 03:39:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB6C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:39:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao07.cox.net (lakermmtao07.cox.net [68.230.240.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA5343D1D for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:39:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20041229033935.GMPC20686.lakermmtao07.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:39:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:40:06 -0600 To: "Jose M Rodriguez" References: <200412281629.iBSGT6WH051075@redesjm.local> <41D21F90.80504@redesjm.local> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <41D21F90.80504@redesjm.local> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54u1 (Linux, build 892) cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] www/firefox: main merge from debian X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:39:37 -0000 On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:08:00 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:29:06 +0100 (CET), Jose M Rodriguez >> wrote: >> >>> >>>> Submitter-Id: current-users >>>> Originator: Jose M Rodriguez (freebsd) >>>> Organization: Redes JM >>>> Confidential: no >>>> Synopsis: [PATCH] www/firefox: main merge from debian >>>> Severity: non-critical >>>> Priority: low >>>> Category: ports >>>> Class: update >>>> Release: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE i386 >>>> Environment: >>> >>> System: FreeBSD orion.redesjm.local 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: >>> Mon Dec 27 17:00:42 CET 2004 >>> >>>> Description: >>> >>> n this patchset: >> >> >> Why don't you (Jose) submit those patches to mozilla's bugzilla instead >> to us? Almost all of patches in our current mozilla ports have been >> merged in Mozilla CVS. > > Well, most of this is Unix specific. Mozilla's goal is platforms, so they should accept those patches or the reports of your, then they will tweak their own patch in CVS. > To go in Mozilla CVS, this need more work. Also, I'm not so profident > with mozilla/gnome. I post this mostly for test, not for main merge. You are making it sounds like it shouldn't go in FreeBSD ports either, because those need the more work. I am still expecting for either Debian team or you to report Mozilla bugzilla with those patches. Doesn't matter if those patches need the more work, the developers will know what they are doing. >>> files/patch-uriloader_exthandler_unix_nsGNOMERegistry.cpp >>> - reprocopy fixes from mozilla (same code and use). >>> >>> files/patch-browser_app_mozilla.in >>> - fix for non posix expr (RELENG_4_9?) This one has been committed by ahze. >>> - protect against missleave as test options >>> >>> files/patch-browser_app_Makefile.in >>> - small fix from debian >>> >>> files/patch-browser_app_profile_extensions_classic_install.rdf.in >>> - small fix from debian Few of like this could use some more details of what's small fix. >>> files/patch-browser_app_profile_firefox.js >>> - disable default browser check >>> - disable app update, from debian >>> - disable autoUpdate, from debian >> >> >> Why disable? If those are enable by default then we _should_ leave >> that way. But, ahze has covered about that we have been approved for >> official build of firefox. > > App autoUpdate or update only works on windows (or if you have rights on > ${PREFIX}/lib/firefox). Ok, it's better to fix than disable it. > As I can see, local extensions/themes can be [auto]updated. I also have > plans to disable plugins dialogs (ej., fedora). You need ports/packages > for this on Unix. I think it is better idea to leave plugins dialogs alone, because what if someone create a FreeBSD plugins and our Firefox will not working because it was disabled? When I used Mozilla on RedHat and it will redirecting me to the right place to download the linux version of flash plugins. It's why I don't think it's good idea to disable it. Cheers, Mezz >> BTW: ahze, I disagree about create a firefox slave. ;-) >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> > > > -- > josemi -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org