From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 19 09:04:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA22811 for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA22759; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA24300; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:02:23 -0700 (PDT) To: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jun 1996 12:53:42 BST." <199606191153.MAA07207@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:02:23 -0700 Message-ID: <24298.835200143@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Unfortunately, it's a fact of life in FreeBSD these days that certain > people in core consider FreeBSD to be theirs and don't see any need to Needless to say, I disagree rather totally with Paul's summary of this situation but I'm not going to waste my time rebutting his individual points. Every time I've gotten sucked into one of Paul's impassioned shit-stirring debates I've regretted it. Not this time. The message may be worth debating, but this particular messenger has lost all credibility with me and by all appearances, it's only a good fight he wants. Any larger purpose is notable only by its absence. Jordan