Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:02:37 -0400 From: Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu> To: Daniel Ponticello <daniel@skytek.it> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk access/MPT under ESX3.5 Message-ID: <20080520020236.GN39854@egr.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <48314227.3080101@skytek.it> References: <48303A1B.9000103@skytek.it> <20080519130031.8978.A2D40D1E@fornext.org> <48314227.3080101@skytek.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:02:31AM +0200, Daniel Ponticello wrote: Hello, monitor# camcontrol negotiate 0:0 -W 16 Current Parameters: (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): sync parameter: 0 (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): offset: 0 (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): bus width: 8 bits (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): disconnection is enabled (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): tagged queueing is enabled monitor# dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/dead.file bs=1024k count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 32.421679 secs (32341817 bytes/sec) monitor# dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/dead.file bs=1024k count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 20.355797 secs (51512402 bytes/sec) No improvements. But it looks like it did not renegotiated the transfers data rate that for some odd reasons are setted as 3.3MB/S instead of 320mb/s. I made some tests using linux 2.18 (debian): debiantest:/home/daniel# uname -a Linux debiantest 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 22:11:31 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux scsi0 : ioc0: LSI53C1030, FwRev=00000000h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=169 Vendor: VMware Model: Virtual disk Rev: 1.0 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 target0:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation target0:0:0: Domain Validation skipping write tests target0:0:0: Ending Domain Validation target0:0:0: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s DT IU RDSTRM RTI WRFLOW PCOMP (6.25 ns, offset 127) debiantest:/home/daniel# dd if=/dev/zero of=dead.file bs=1024k count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 5.01316 seconds, 209 MB/s For the Linux test, are you sure it didn't cache part of the write before returning? You may need to add some syncs and make it part of the elapsed time. Just checking because this seems to be my experience.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080520020236.GN39854>