From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:19:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D536516A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:19:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from gate.bitblocks.com (bitblocks.com [209.204.185.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0B443D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:19:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.bitblocks.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0CIJYNw063521; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:19:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Message-Id: <200601121819.k0CIJYNw063521@gate.bitblocks.com> To: Eric Anderson In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:14:30 CST." <43C69C86.6000707@centtech.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:19:34 -0800 From: Bakul Shah Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: increasing dd disk to disk transfer rate X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:19:38 -0000 > I think after the dd is done, fsck should be run against the affected > filesystems, which should take care of most of the issues. For metadata yes, but not for normal file data. He wouldn't even know what got trashed. > The OP's question was how to make dd faster, not really how to get the > data across safely. :) Sometime you have to answer the question they should've asked! That is what a diagnostician has to do. Fix the cause. Not the symptom.