From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 25 14:13: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908A37BC16 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 14:13:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06429; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 14:12:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38DD39E7.B69844E4@gorean.org> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 14:12:55 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Blake Swensen , Walter Brameld Subject: Re: Upgrading from 2.1.3-RELEASE References: <3.0.16.20000325122800.1ba72a38@mail.pyramus.com> <20000325130640.J21029@fw.wintelcom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Blake Swensen [000325 12:49] wrote: > > I am about to upgrade from 2.1.6-RELEASE to 3.2-RELEASE. Are there any > > "gotcha's" that I should know about? Yes, if you are planning a source upgrade it won't work. You should back up all of your important data and plan to do a clean install. > 3.2 is _really old_ and has bugs as well as a vulnerable bind and > procfs, I'd upgrade to 3.4-stable or even 4.0-stable. Agreed. You'll probably want to go with 4.0 if you are the kind of person who doesn't like to upgrade often. Doug -- "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously. The master simply replied, "Mu." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message