From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 24 16:37:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA87216A41F for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@gordonross.org.uk) Received: from srv1.gordonross.me.uk (srv1.gordonross.me.uk [82.152.40.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7621243D48 for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@gordonross.org.uk) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=freebsd) by srv1.gordonross.me.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EJD15-0003ns-TD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:36:48 +0100 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:36:47 +0100 (BST) From: Gordon Ross X-X-Sender: freebsd@openbsd36-1.gordonross.me.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <448xxm1l6b.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: References: <448xxm1l6b.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Sharing /usr/ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:37:10 -0000 On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Gordon Ross writes: > >> I've got two FreeBSD 5.4 machines. One is a server, the other is a >> desktop. >> >> I've mounted on the desktop the /usr/ports directory from the >> server. My idea being that I could share the one /usr/ports directory >> amongst my machines and save disc space, and also save having to >> recompile everything whenever I install a port. >> >> My problem is that, if I do a "make" on one machine, I can't then do a >> "make install" on the other machine. (When I try, nothing happens) >> >> I haven't mounted any of the directories from under /var/db (e.g. pkg, >> ports) >> >> Is what I'm trying to do possible ? >> If so, what am I missing or doing wrong ? > > It would probably be faster to build packages and let the client > install those, but I think what you're looking for is "make reinstall". Ah, that seems to be doing something.. Thanks ! GTG