From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 9 16:24:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id D0D28869; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:24:16 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r383191 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20150409162416.GA54797@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150408194202.GA45809@hades.panopticon> <5525A9C1.5010003@FreeBSD.org> <20150408232144.GX21982@hades.panopticon> <5525D48E.5090305@FreeBSD.org> <20150409110221.GB45809@hades.panopticon> <55269785.7030307@FreeBSD.org> <20150409153856.GA31951@FreeBSD.org> <55269FE4.2030208@FreeBSD.org> <20150409160330.GB31951@FreeBSD.org> <5526A52E.4090801@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5526A52E.4090801@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:24:16 -0000 On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:13:34AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/9/2015 11:03 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 10:51:00AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> Read the commit log again for r369644. Setting one var and not the other > >> leads to incorrect behavior in many ports. You must have them matching. > >> It is not just about jails/chroots. > > > > I've (re)read it and understand what you're trying to accomplish; my point > > here is not to *build* things against custom OSVERSION, but just check if > > some variables are set correctly, e.g. "make -V FOO OSVERSION=xxx" is what > > I miss. Is there a way to allow it again somehow? > > I understand what you're trying to do and I agree it would be useful if > it worked. Validating port logic (such as whether EXTRA_PATCHES has > something) based on OSVERSION is very useful. I'll think about how to > fix it. Right, EXTRA_PATCHES is a very good example. Good to know that there is mutual understanding now and a chance for a fix. :) Thanks, ./danfe