From owner-freebsd-small Fri Mar 9 22:39:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA25637B719 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 22:39:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA60808; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 07:40:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200103100640.HAA60808@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: 386DX-40 with 8 Mb RAM In-Reply-To: from Vladimir Zakharov at "Mar 10, 2001 04:28:45 pm" To: Vladimir Zakharov Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 07:40:08 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi All! > > Is it possible at all to route internal private network (5 PCs, no > DHCP) through PicoBSD running on subj? Connection to ISP - dialout via > conventional modem. Dial on demand is preferable. i cannot help noticing that many small router boxes are available on the market which have an ethernet and a modem and do all sort of things (autodial, dhcp, nat...) for a price of $200 or less and a very small form factor. Even the apple airport (or the wavelan 'RG' base station) cost some $250-300 and has an 802.11 interface. This said... > If yes, what flavour of PicoBSD is recommended? probably the 'net' one, and one based on FreeBSD 3.x or 2.x (due to code bloat, i am not sure 4.x can run in 8MB). You might need to backport the build scripts and file tree and crunchgen modifications from 4.3 to 3.x/2.x cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message