Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 May 2020 11:22:34 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 246623] www/caddy: Update to 2.0.0
Message-ID:  <bug-246623-7788-H6AqrUWAYA@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-246623-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-246623-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246623

--- Comment #5 from dan@familybrown.org ---
A couple of questions:

1.  Given the complete lack of backward compatibility, might it be better to
have a separate port for Caddy v2 (called, perhaps, "caddy2")?

2.  Is it possible to build Caddy's plugins with this port?  I'm most
interested in the DNS validation plugins, but I'd suppose any others would =
work
the same way.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246623-7788-H6AqrUWAYA>