From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 20:24:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C85216A41A for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5FE913C491 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 7503 invoked by uid 399); 30 Oct 2007 20:24:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2007 20:24:15 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: 'make -DNO_DEPENDS install' causing error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:24:17 -0000 I'm really stumped on this one, and I'm wondering if someone can come up with something clever here. In the last revision of portmaster I changed the order of how things are installed (parent port first, then any run-depends) and added -DNO_DEPENDS to the make install line so that portmaster could handle installation of the run-depends. This works fine on my 6-stable and 8-current boxes, but I've had two users this morning report that this causes the following error: make: don't know how to make install. Stop I can't reproduce this at all (obviously, or I wouldn't have committed the update) and so far no attempts by the users to debug it has produced even a hint of what's happening. There is nothing unusual in their make.conf or ports.conf. One user is using 6.2-p8, I'm waiting for the other user to respond on what version they are using. Help? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection