Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:35:43 -0500
From:      Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, autotools@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
Message-ID:  <CADLFttcQz17KKvfBvcee%2BLfgCET4xfTajnc3y_EQoracuTV3tQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130318192408.GQ72627@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20130318174150.GN72627@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CADLFttfLAy%2BY0=TwKG35hjjRsdS3H=3UiEzFmk1A71_BpWFGWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLFttekfAFks3QDwGwK9ugth5pM21fiQeQ2d=8Zib5FKTL69Q@mail.gmail.com> <20130318192408.GQ72627@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 18, 2013 2:24 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:15:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define
our
> > defaults
> > > values for a couple of things, and prevent the "slow" and possibly
wrong
> > > autodetection.
> > >
> > > Here is a patch that makes use of it:
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff
> > >
> > > As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can
fall
> > back on
> > > gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is
> > removed you
> > > can get trouble.
> > >
> > > In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in
order to
> > always
> > > use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected.
> > >
> > > I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can
be
> > added
> > > in the futur.
> > >
> > > Any thought?
> >
> > There are some ports that need to use gnu tar, gnu sed, gnu grep and
other
> > gnu stuff. How will this cache affect on those ports?
> >
> > > regards,
> > > Bapt
>
> We can always overwrite those in CONFIGURE_ENV if needed, and I'll run an
> exp-run to make sure no ports requiring gsed, gtar etc fails.

If it works very well then I think it sounds good.

> regards,
> Bapt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLFttcQz17KKvfBvcee%2BLfgCET4xfTajnc3y_EQoracuTV3tQ>