From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb  8 15:42:39 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24467
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:42:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA24453;
          Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:42:33 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: (from eischen@localhost)
	by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id SAA04278;
	Mon, 8 Feb 1999 18:41:45 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 18:41:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Message-Id: <199902082341.SAA04278@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: adding DHCP client to src/contrib/
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> I am planning on adding the Wide-DHCP client to src/contrib/ and
> src/sbin/ in a few days.
> 
> I have it bmaked and ready go to.  I have choosen the WIDE client because
> it is much smaller space-wise than the ISC client and its configuration
> is simplier.

I tried both, and I must say that ISC was easier to use and configure.
It also seems to work better, at least as a server.  I couldn't get
Wide-DHCP to work, but it's been a while since I tried though...

I don't know why you think the termcap-type configuration is easier
to understand than ISCs configuration :-)

Dan Eischen
eischen@vigrid.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message