From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 19:29:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615E91065674; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272AA8FC1B; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:5974:a369:b987:bc4d]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5FCC94AC1C; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:29:38 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:29:33 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1359447341.20111124232933@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: References: <1957615267.20111123230026@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20111123194444.GE50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does UFS2 send BIO_FLUSH to GEOM when update metadata (with softupdates)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:29:39 -0000 Hello, Ivan. You wrote 24 =ED=EE=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 20:42:15: > http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/fsync_flush.patch Your soulution could be merged with my one -- you've added special flag at BUF level, which could be good idea. But, on other hand, IMHO any non-ASYNC BUF should be converted to SYNC BIO. Now we break semantic of B_ASYNC flag -- don't guarantee sync operation on GEOM elvel when buffer request one (by not-setting B_ASYNC). --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov