From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 13 18:54:25 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3339FDB6
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:54:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca)
Received: from eccles.ee.ryerson.ca (eccles.ee.ryerson.ca [141.117.1.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0298DEF3
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.ee.ryerson.ca (eccles [172.16.1.2])
 by eccles.ee.ryerson.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2DIohIm078872;
 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
 (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca)
Received: from 206.108.127.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dmagda)
 by webmail.ee.ryerson.ca with HTTP; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:50:43 -0400
Message-ID: <dd47b0701af3e2b6c92fe70fa0da3fc1.squirrel@webmail.ee.ryerson.ca>
In-Reply-To: <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com>
References: <web-11636850@mailback4.g2host.com> <513E2DA5.70200@mac.com>
 <web-12282796@mailback4.g2host.com> <op.wts7cnaeg7njmm@michael-think>
 <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:50:43 -0400
Subject: Re: svn - but smaller?
From: "David Magda" <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca>
To: "John Mehr" <jcm@visi.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:54:25 -0000

On Tue, March 12, 2013 19:32, John Mehr wrote:
> This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort
> of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of
> least surprise, I'm all for it.  The one default that may
> be unexpected is the defaulting to the stable branch --
> people who track the security branches will be left out. 
> So maybe something like:
>
> svnup --ports
> svnup --stable
> svnup --security (or --release)
>
> Thoughts?

If svnup will eventually going to be used to update a variety of
repositories, on a plethora of operating systems, then hard coding the
above may not be appropriate. Something akin to "svnup --repo={ports,
stable, security, release}" may be better, and then have a configuration
file with the settings.