From owner-cvs-usrsbin Sat May 3 15:33:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA22165 for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Sat, 3 May 1997 15:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA22139; Sat, 3 May 1997 15:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA00883; Sun, 4 May 1997 00:32:56 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 00:32:56 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199705032232.AAA00883@bitbox.follo.net> From: Eivind Eklund To: Joerg Wunsch CC: CVS-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-usrsbin@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Joerg Wunsch's message of Sat, 3 May 1997 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/syslogd syslogd.8 syslogd.c References: <199705032217.PAA25401@freefall.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-cvs-usrsbin@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [Joerg Wunsch] > Add an option to syslogd to restrict the IP addresses that are allowed > to log to this syslogd. It's too late to develop the inter-syslogd > communications protocol mentioned in the BUGS section, some 10 years > too late. Thus, restricting the IP address range is about the most > effective change we can do if we want to allow incoming syslog > messages at all. > > Please state opinions about whether to merge this change into 2.2 or > not (i've got it running on RELENG_2_2 anyway). Wait 1-2 weeks, merge if no bug reports. (IMHO, we should try to migrate all minor changes to 2.2; we don't want it developing the way 2.1 did) Eivind.