From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 21:04:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3579116A4EA for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:04:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7712143D2F for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:04:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from daemon.jim-liesl.org ([70.33.46.68]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050509210432.NSBI4191.mta13.adelphia.net@daemon.jim-liesl.org> for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 17:04:32 -0400 Received: from daemon.jim-liesl.org (localhost.clspco.adelphia.net [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED3466E1 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 15:05:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by daemon.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83486317 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 15:05:27 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <427FD026.5030204@jim-liesl.org> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 15:03:34 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Common disk format between 2.4.current linux and FreeBSD 5.3 and later X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 21:04:34 -0000 I'm building a usb harddrive and i'll be using it under both linux and FreeBSD. vfat is not a contender due to a 2gb limit of file size (I'm using it as a dump disk and I don't want to deal with multiple volumes). It seems that BSD can talk to ext2 partitions and Linux can talk to the older UFS format. Suggestions on which is the more stable implementation for a r/w environment? I've read that there were issues in the past, but I could see anything within the last year or so. Thanks jim