From owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org  Wed Nov 11 20:22:58 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6108BA2A2E9
 for <freebsd-sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2F81764
 for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id 47800A2A2E6; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462C6A2A2E5
 for <sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [66.135.54.68])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8911761;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 1A22656083; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:22:57 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:22:57 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Craig Butler <craig001@lerwick.hopto.org>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Anna Wilcox <AWilcox@wilcox-tech.com>,
 Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>, Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>,
 Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com>, sparc64@freebsd.org,
 Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about
 Sparc64
Message-ID: <20151111202257.GB6857@lonesome.com>
References: <563A5893.1030607@freebsd.org>
 <39947478-4710-47D8-BAB1-FC93979570B6@mail.turbofuzz.com>
 <f4d1114833994331bd1fd2273f305abc@XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com>
 <4004425.K7Etsx0SLe@ralph.baldwin.cx>
 <1411902059.696.1447273047281.JavaMail.craig@w520>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1411902059.696.1447273047281.JavaMail.craig@w520>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-sparc64>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:22:58 -0000

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:17:32PM +0000, Craig Butler wrote:
> Just to raise something else as well, port maintainers seem hesitant
> to push sparc64 fixes in.

They don't have an effective way to test them.  All they can test for
is the no-regression case on the hardware they have access to.

mcl