From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed May 10 11:39:24 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA29878
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:39:24 -0700
Received: from Adonis.Dorm10.NCTU.edu.tw (Adonis.Dorm10.NCTU.edu.tw [140.113.145.84])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA29872
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:39:17 -0700
Received: (from jdli@localhost) by Adonis.Dorm10.NCTU.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id CAA08242 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 11 May 1995 02:40:02 +0800
From: 醉生夢死 無言以對 <jdli@Adonis.Dorm10.NCTU.edu.tw>
Message-Id: <199505101840.CAA08242@Adonis.Dorm10.NCTU.edu.tw>
Subject: swap sequential.....
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 02:40:01 +0800 (CST)
Reply-To: jdli@csie.nctu.edu.tw
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 435       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


	Hi :
	
	Now I have two swap configured, one is a 64MB swap partition,
	another is a 32MB swap-file.
	I found that FreeBSD will swap Interleaved, this idea is very
	good if I have more than one swap partitions, but I think that
	the swap-file should be slower than a swap partition.
	Is it possible to make FreeBSD swap partition first, then file?

	Thanks.

-- 
                                           Mail: jdli@csie.nctu.edu.tw