From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  2 06:10:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB97916A4CE
	for <openoffice@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 06:10:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from satie.private.org (qclgw.qcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.190])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5BE43D39
	for <openoffice@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 06:10:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by satie.private.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB26Agk8014730;
	Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:10:43 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:10:42 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20041202.151042.730570312.chat95@mac.com>
To: sander.vesik@gmail.com
From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <dcb2c27a04120108305a57b4c9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dcb2c27a04112914476601baf7@mail.gmail.com>
	<20041201.131943.783371855.chat95@mac.com>
	<dcb2c27a04120108305a57b4c9@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: private
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: m62 break in sw
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 06:10:51 -0000

In Message-ID: <dcb2c27a04120108305a57b4c9@mail.gmail.com> 
Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are however problems with javaldx (which doesn't like the BSD
> way of calling the jdk 1.4.2-p6 or similar and needs patching) and
> something with libxml2.so version. And epm has some more
> complaints....

yes. I know about it.
javaldx always fails, as you know jvmfwk is largely changed.
and also recently pythonupgrade cws is integrated...

thanks,
-- NAKATA, Maho