From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 22:33:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2542116A41F for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BFB43D45 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005091322335201200mse5ke>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:33:52 +0000 Message-ID: <432753CF.6020001@bfoz.net> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:33:51 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050908) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Jail to jail network performance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:33:54 -0000 I have a 5.4-S box running apache2 that's serving data from mysql running on the same box. I'm thinking about putting both in seperate jails, partly for security and partly for practice. Would this impact network performance between the two? Currently the mysql connection is using localhost which I understand to be faster than a network socket. Does jail-to-jail traffic use the same mechanism? or something else? Thanks