From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jan  6 15:59:36 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA29890
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 15:59:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Aspen.Woc.Atinc.COM (aspen.woc.atinc.com [198.138.38.205])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA29881
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 15:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jmb@localhost) by Aspen.Woc.Atinc.COM (8.6.12/8.6.9) id SAA14977; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 18:58:21 -0500
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 1996 18:58:19 -0500 (EST)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freebsd.org>
X-Sender: jmb@Aspen.Woc.Atinc.COM
To: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: s/rpc\.\(.*\)/\1/g?
In-Reply-To: <199601060415.UAA06126@precipice.shockwave.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960106185808.14939E-100000@Aspen.Woc.Atinc.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 5 Jan 1996, Paul Traina wrote:

> I'd have no objection to renaming the new utilities, if, and only if,
> we do it consistently and rename all the rpc utilities.  This seems reasonable
> given that nfsd and mountd don't have rpc. in front of them.
> 
> What are people's feelings?  Rename or don't?

	rename.   

Jonathan M. Bresler        FreeBSD Postmaster         jmb@FreeBSD.ORG
play go. ride bike. hack FreeBSD.--ah the good life 
i am moving to a new job.                 PLEASE USE: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG