From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 19:51:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF871065677; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D601566BB; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E8B63B5.2000803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:51:17 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4E8AE0CD.8010805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E8AE0CD.8010805@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Current , Colin Percival Subject: Re: portsnap5 problem, portsnap error handling X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:51:54 -0000 On 10/04/2011 03:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Not sure which list would be best for this Given that it's a ports issue, freebsd-ports@ comes to mind ... -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/