Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:31:21 -0500 From: Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Vim does not build with ruby19 (since ruby19 does not install the ruby command) Message-ID: <CAGsORuAR7VN4BNSS%2BjtomK3P2zTa0vFZWLp2NC97kDXBupg4Ow@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E948CB3.2010101@yandex.ru> References: <CAGsORuDGOHY5zfVx3%2BpKNF6XCW__JDhFGZihGVCb-gSJQKwCTA@mail.gmail.com> <4E948CB3.2010101@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>wrote:
> Zhihao Yuan wrote on 11.10.2011 17:56:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I specified RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9 in /etc/make.conf, and rebuild everything
>> relates to ruby, and I found the successfully built Vim lacks of the ruby
>> support.
>>
>> By default, vim requires the 'ruby' command when building WITH_RUBY=1, but
>> ruby19 does not install the command.
>>
>> One solution is that to install the command as a symbol link, and mark
>> ruby-1.8 and ruby-1.9 as conflicts.
>>
>> Another one only works for vim, to set the '--with-ruby-command=ruby19' as
>> a
>> configure args.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>>
> I'd check if we already have ${PREFIX}/bin/ruby, and if not - install
> symlink. If ${PREFIX}/bin/ruby is already there - install just ruby1X. This
> can be added to both ruby ports.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ruslan
>
> Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
>
I suggest that to make the 'ruby' command obey the RUBY_DEFAULT_VER setting,
like what python ports do.
--
Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
___________________________________________________
4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGsORuAR7VN4BNSS%2BjtomK3P2zTa0vFZWLp2NC97kDXBupg4Ow>