From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 11:51:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C4837B401 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx7.roble.com (mx7.roble.com [206.40.34.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BB443FB1 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030805155842.6D55937B405@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20030805155842.6D55937B405@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20030805185117.41860DAC5F@mx7.roble.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 18:51:18 -0000 Mike Hoskins wrote: >... but I can also see KISS. If you add more data than >absolutely needed, confusion may also arise... > >> I think that if one takes the `Affects' lines (and the rest of the >> advisory) at face value, without second-guessing, that it is crystal >> clear what versions of FreeBSD are affected. Along those lines it might be worth moving Affects: to the top of advisories page format, ahead of Credits:, Announced:, Module:, and Category:. A "REL-Advisories" list would also be helpful to those of us who don't use beta releases (aka -STABLE). -- Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/