From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 18:47:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2E737B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from foem.leiden.webweaving.org (fia224-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44E343F85 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:47:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Received: from foem (IDENT:chuckwebweaving.org@foem [10.11.0.2]) h4T1l4v7065409; Thu, 29 May 2003 03:47:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 03:47:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik X-X-Sender: dirkx@foem To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030528.192257.43849900.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20030529034236.K22309-100000@foem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcic setup / wi0 timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 01:47:25 -0000 On Wed, 28 May 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > OK. You might have a little better luck with 5.1-BETA, or you might ok; cvsuping to -HEAD. Did not see any 5_1 tags. > not. However, you might try http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/pir.c > as root and tell me if it finds a $PIR table. The boot verbose says > no, but I can't recall if 5.0-RELEASE printed it or not (I think it > does). CNodeRabo# gcc -o pir pir.c CNodeRabo# ./pir pir: can't find $PIR in BIOS segment I geuss not. > The Pentium 200MHz that you have is old enough that it may be a little > too old... Aye - these are donated Siemen's machines we use on www.wirelessleiden.nl as rooftop routers/nodes. Nothing too fancy needed there. > It also looks like pcibios_get_version() is returning 0, since I don't > see a line like > pcibios: BIOS version 2.0 > in the output. > > However, I'd have expected to see > pci_cfgintr: BIOS %x.%02x doesn't support interrupt routing > just before the > pci_cfgintr: can't route an interrupt to 0:17 INTA > line. Aye - it seems to think that no intpin is connected perhaps > Actually, I take it back. 5.1 won't help, but might make it easier to > diagnose. Thanks for the help sofar - I'll report if 5.1 gives some substancial change - but I guess for now I am stuck behind a BIOS to old. Dw