From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 20:31:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48D316A4CE; Mon, 3 May 2004 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seed.net.tw (sn13.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F48843D2D; Mon, 3 May 2004 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw) Received: from [61.59.121.140] (port=49694 helo=chihiro.leafy.idv.tw) by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.23:1) id 1BKqej-000L7G-6U; Tue, 04 May 2004 11:31:41 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5982F5; Tue, 4 May 2004 11:31:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from chihiro.leafy.idv.tw ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chihiro.leafy.idv.tw [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00642-02; Tue, 4 May 2004 11:31:45 +0800 (CST) Received: by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9383929F; Tue, 4 May 2004 11:31:45 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 11:31:45 +0800 From: leafy To: David O'Brien Message-ID: <20040504033145.GA33237@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> References: <1B8C2E08B21B8743A2B3AED07407DA76039F9AEF@nj7460exch002u.ho.lucent.com> <20040504030946.GA44550@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040504030946.GA44550@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at leafy.idv.tw cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" cc: "Rajamani, Rajarajan \(Rajarajan\)" Subject: Re: portupgrade failure for vim-6.2.521 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 03:31:48 -0000 On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:09:46PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > *sigh* Would SOMEONE PLEASE TEST THIS PATCH AND GET BACK TO ME??? > > This is the 5th time I've sent it out today and no responce from anyone > who has the skills to apply the patch and test. (it adds 502 to the > BADPATCHES list). I can't reproduce it locally. I'm starting to think > it is a 4.x-only problem. Ok, this works for me on a -stable system. Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming